Search for: "Ramirez v. People of the State of California"
Results 1 - 20
of 64
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2019, 12:04 pm
Nothing published from the California judiciary today (at least thus far). [read post]
29 May 2007, 8:41 pm
The case is Ramirez v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 2:32 pm
But in TransUnion v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 6:54 pm
Ramirez has argued that his search was unlawful, and the evidence resulting from the search must be suppressed under the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine, as detailed in People v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 6:54 pm
Ramirez has argued that his search was unlawful, and the evidence resulting from the search must be suppressed under the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine, as detailed in People v. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 4:13 am
People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 12:10 pm
Ramirez to comments such as “Mexicans like you would rather lie than tell the truth” and “I never trusted your kind of people. [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:25 pm
[Y]ou’re aware that the State of California requires you to pass a background check, right? [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:18 am
The clear rejection of Ramirez in California is good news. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:37 am
But just days after the California Supreme Court Upholds In-State Tuition For Illegal Immigrants, in Robert Martinez et al., v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:55 pm
Both involve minors (this one, a 14-year old, and in Ramirez a 16-year old). [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:42 pm
Supreme Court case Riley v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 2:48 pm
We are expecting over 800 high school students from 34 counties to present their case (People v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
” They convinced voters that the death penalty was needed to punish people like “Richard ‘The Night Stalker’ Ramirez [who] kidnapped, raped, tortured and mutilated 14 people and terrorized 11 more including children and senior citizens. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:31 pm
Justice Scalia has a well-known opinion (his concurrence in California v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 7:42 am
”) People v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
In a case on the plenary docket, Ramirez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm
By Linda Friedman Ramirez[1] On February 28, 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided Innovation Lab v Wolf and affirmed a preliminary injunction against the Department of Homeland Security in its controversial Migrant Protection Protocols.[2] The injunction had been issued by the District Court for the Northern District of California on April 8, 2019. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm
By Linda Friedman Ramirez[1] On February 28, 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided Innovation Lab v Wolf and affirmed a preliminary injunction against the Department of Homeland Security in its controversial Migrant Protection Protocols.[2] The injunction had been issued by the District Court for the Northern District of California on April 8, 2019. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm
Ahn was arrested in California on April 18, 2019. [read post]
